|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 13 post(s) |
Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken
Ragnarok.
19
   |
Posted - 2013.12.04 21:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why a switch on/off?
Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying.
In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless.
Simple as that. - Kina Ayami
I lol'd
Would you support the reduction of this game to arrows on a black screen? With white dots as bullets and missiles?
Hell do away with the projectiles at all and just leave the text telling you that you hit.
Make eve text based, (okay i exagerate here but i hope you get my point)
Everything in this game is to add to the immersion in the game, the jump effect give continuance to the single shard idea.
Nut up man |
Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken
Ragnarok.
19
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 23:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:Would you support the reduction of this game to arrows on a black screen? With white dots as bullets and missiles?
Hell do away with the projectiles at all and just leave the text telling you that you hit.
Make eve text based, (okay i exagerate here but i hope you get my point)
Everything in this game is to add to the immersion in the game, the jump effect give continuance to the single shard idea.
Reductio ad absurdum arguments will get you nowhere. Immersion at the expense of playability is not an improvment. Also, how would having a client-side option to disable this effect (just like many other visual effects in this game) change your immersion in any way? CCP promised they would improve this animation to reduce the ill effects others have experienced. They have had more than enough time to attempt a solution, and have failed to deliver or even communicate their progress. They have demonstrated that they are either unwilling or unable to fix this "their way," andI think it is high time that they put their egos aside, and admit that the "cop out" of actually listening to their players is the best option at this point.
What expense of playability?
Perhaps if you are still using the machine you got when eve was released but that's really your problem/fault
Who are you to judge someones "enough time" CCP don't have you at the top of their priorities I am sure. There is no requirement to keep you updated either, honestly they owe you squat but access to their game and various things it entails.
Why does your argument for reduction hold any gravity over mine? It is the same thing in effect, you are just skewed as to supporting your own idea methinks. |
Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken
Ragnarok.
19
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 00:31:00 -
[3] - Quote
Read through 84 pages of dribble? No thanks, GD isn't renownd for its excellent levels of posting quality.
So from your last response it seems that because something is affecting someone negatively it should be chaged. I can see merit there, but is it an "I get seasick from wobbles" or is there an actual photosensitive response that could be harmful?
I'm sure theres a blanket disclamer on anything you play nowdays that there may be flashing lights and moving cameras and that you experience this at your own risk.
CCP is obliged to nothing more than services paid. Don't bother throwing a hissyfit from lack of communication, you or I am not important enough to be walked through every or any stage of their development.
Why shouldn't we have a switch?
Because we don't need it and it adds nothing. |
Jill Chastot
Modulated Dreams
AAA Citizens
19
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 20:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Opia Munba wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:
Why shouldn't we have a switch?
Because we don't need it and it adds nothing.
Some people may perceive a need and it would certainly add quality of life to others. Whether you are for or against an off switch, not understanding this makes you look a little slow.
No need to launch a personal attack for an answer to a question, that is childish behaviour. |
Jill Chastot
Modulated Dreams
AAA Citizens
41
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 02:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Opia Munba wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:Opia Munba wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:
Why shouldn't we have a switch?
Because we don't need it and it adds nothing.
Some people may perceive a need and it would certainly add quality of life to others. Whether you are for or against an off switch, not understanding this makes you look a little slow. No need to launch a personal attack for an answer to a question, that is childish behaviour. A lack of empathy towards people who have problems with the animation may be percieved by them as a personal attack from you. Strange thing perception, i`m sorry the observation offended you. :(
Lack of empathy is the absence of it, relating that to an offensive is most curious, please do explain your logic. I cannot for the lif of me follow any train of though that they would cross. |
Jill Chastot
Modulated Dreams
AAA Citizens
41
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 02:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:Read through 84 pages of dribble? No thanks, GD isn't renownd for its excellent levels of posting quality.
So from your last response it seems that because something is affecting someone negatively it should be chaged. I can see merit there, but is it an "I get seasick from wobbles" or is there an actual photosensitive response that could be harmful?
I'm sure theres a blanket disclamer on anything you play nowdays that there may be flashing lights and moving cameras and that you experience this at your own risk.
CCP is obliged to nothing more than services paid. Don't bother throwing a hissyfit from lack of communication, you or I am not important enough to be walked through every or any stage of their development.
Why shouldn't we have a switch?
Because we don't need it and it adds nothing. If you cannot bother to read.. do not dare to write. Simple as that. Now .. go read or SHUT UP and go back to your useles hole where trolls come from, because writting in a thread without even readign it can be ignorance, stupidity or a troll attempt.
I beg you pardon oh honourable forum warrior.
I can never live up to the time you invest to greatly research and read ever shard of text on topics and threads.
But seriously who the hell do you think you are to tell me my opinion is less on these forums?
Seems like you need a reassesing of your attitude. Because last i checked there was no rule on this forum saying that you are above anyone. |
Jill Chastot
Modulated Dreams
AAA Citizens
42
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 21:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
So according to you...
tldr: read the 85 pages or gtfo?
Right. You can hide behind the notion of that all you want. |
|
|
| |
|